Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that certain campaign finance restrictions are inconsistent with the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. The Court, in a 5-4 decision with Justice Anthony Kennedy writing the majority opinion, struck down Section 203 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, which had prohibited corporations, labor unions and other organizations from paying for "electioneering communications," holding that the prohibition of independent expenditures by corporations and unions violated the First Amendment. The ruling sparked significant controversy, with supporters defending it as a safeguard of free speech and critics arguing it lets large corporations wield disproportionate political power by spending unlimited amounts to support chosen candidates.
Facts
Classification
Document TypeCourt Ruling or Judicial Opinion 1 Connections
Drafted By
Source Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School: Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010)
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Citizens United v. FEC
WikipediaIntroduction
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States ruling that certain campaign finance restrictions are inconsistent with the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment.
In Group: United States Supreme Court Decisions Since 2000, Lead paragraph
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States ruling that certain campaign finance restrictions are inconsistent with the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment.
View the Source Wikidata: Citizens United v. FEC
Wikidata Q1092602, class allow-list match, case-insensitive label variant (w-bbfill-smallsix2-0926/resolve_ci.ps1)View the Source Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School: Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010)
Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law SchoolDrafted By: Anthony Kennedy, Opinion of the CourtQuote, Drafted By: Anthony Kennedy, Opinion of the Court
Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the Court
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.