Political Atlas

How Power Is Arranged
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Document

Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala

Judicial Decisions and Rulings

Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, also known as the Fundamental Rights Case, was a landmark 1973 decision of the Supreme Court of India that outlined the basic structure doctrine of the Indian Constitution. A thirteen-judge bench decided by a 7-6 majority that Parliament, while possessing wide powers to amend the Constitution, did not have the power to destroy or emasculate its basic elements or fundamental features, with Justice Hans Raj Khanna arguing the Constitution possesses a basic structure of constitutional principles and values. The doctrine forms the basis of the Indian judiciary's power to review and override constitutional amendments enacted by Parliament, and the case also defined the extent to which Parliament could restrict property rights in pursuit of land reform.

Facts
Classification
Document Type
Court Ruling or Judicial Opinion 1
Connections

Influenced

Minerva Mills applies and extends the basic structure doctrine Kesavananda Bharati established.

Source Minerva Mills v. Union of India (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
Wikipedia
  • Introduction
    His Holiness Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru & Ors.
  • In Group: Constitutional Court Decisions Outside the United States, Lead paragraph
    State of Kerala & Anr. (Writ Petition (Civil) 135 of 1970), also known as the Kesavananda Bharati judgement, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that outlined the basic structure doctrine of the Indian Constitution.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.