Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court holding that legislative redistricting claims are justiciable under the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause, opening federal courts to hear such cases for the first time. The case arose from a challenge to Tennessee's legislative districts, which had not been redrawn since 1901, and in a majority opinion by Justice William Brennan the Court rejected the state's argument that redistricting was a nonjusticiable political question, remanding the case for further proceedings over Justice Felix Frankfurter's dissent. The decision set the precedent that led to the Court's 1964 one person, one vote rulings in Wesberry v. Sanders and Reynolds v. Sims requiring roughly equal populations across electoral districts.
Facts
Key ProvisionDecided 1962: held redistricting justiciable under the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause, opening the door to Wesberry v. Sanders and Reynolds v. Sims (1964). 1 Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Decided by the Supreme Court of the United States, 1962.
Sources
1. Baker v. Carr (Wikipedia)
WikipediaLead sectionQuote, Lead section
the Court held that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question under the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.