Political Atlas

How Power Is Arranged
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Documents

Shelby County v. Holder

Judicial Decisions and Rulings

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act of 1965's preclearance regime, under which certain states and localities with histories of racial discrimination in voting had to obtain federal approval before changing their voting laws. On 25 June 2013 the Court ruled 5 to 4 that the formula determining which jurisdictions were covered by preclearance was unconstitutional because it relied on data more than forty years old, and while the Court did not strike down the preclearance requirement itself, no jurisdiction remained subject to it without a new coverage formula from Congress. Studies since the ruling have found it associated with reduced minority voter turnout, closures of polling places concentrated in the counties previously covered, and cuts to early voting.

Facts
Year
2013 1
Key Provision
Decided 25 June 2013: struck down Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, ending its coverage formula for federal preclearance of jurisdictions' voting changes. 1
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Decided by the Supreme Court of the United States, 2013.

Sources
1. Shelby County v. Holder (Wikipedia)
WikipediaHolding section
Quote, Holding section
Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is unconstitutional; its formula can no longer be used as a basis for subjecting jurisdictions to preclearance.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.