Political Atlas

How Power Is Arranged
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Political Mechanism

Mixed-Member Proportional Representation

Also Known As Personalized Proportional Representation
Electoral Systems and Voting Methods

An electoral system that elects part of a legislature from single-member districts and the remainder from party lists, with the list seats allocated to correct any gap between a party's district-seat share and its share of the vote, so the combined result is proportional even though half the seats are won by plurality. West Germany adopted the system for the Bundestag from its first postwar election in 1949, refining it into its fully compensatory form by the 1953 federal election, and it remains the system's defining real-world example; New Zealand adopted the same design for its Parliament after a 1993 referendum, replacing first past the post. Britannica's own survey of proportional systems classes it, alongside the party-list and single-transferable-vote methods, as one of the working methods that achieve proportionality despite differing in mechanics.

Facts
Origin Year
1949 1
West Germany's first Bundestag election in 1949 already combined a district tier and a list tier, but the fully compensatory mechanism that makes the overall result proportional, list seats correcting for district results, was in place by the 1953 federal election, which the source cited here credits as the system's settled starting point.
Founding Context
Mixed member proportional systems were designed to combine the local accountability of single member constituency voting with the overall fairness of proportional representation, using a second, compensatory tier of list seats to correct the disproportionality a plurality tier alone would otherwise produce. West Germany's postwar electoral system is the one most often credited with developing the fully compensatory version of this design. 2
Connections

Associated With

Germany, Countries
Source Germany: The Original Mixed Member Proportional System (ACE Project)

Influenced

Duverger's Law, Political Mechanisms

Why this is disputed. Whether mixed-member proportional representation's compensatory list tier produces the same multiparty pull as full proportional representation, or whether the plurality-won district tier still exerts some of the two-party pressure Duverger's law predicts, is disputed in the comparative electoral systems literature; Germany itself has sustained more than two significant parties under the system, which both sides of the debate cite for different reasons.

Practiced By

New Zealand, Countries
Source Mixed-Member Proportional Representation (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Mixed-Member Proportional Representation (Wikipedia)
Wikipedia
  • Other names section
    referred to as 'personalized proportional representation' (German: personalisiertes Verhaltniswahlrecht) or PPR.
  • In Group: Proportional Representation Systems, Lead paragraph
    in a way that produces proportional representation overall
  • Practiced By: New Zealand, Lead paragraph
    The specific system of New Zealand for electing its parliament is known as MMP
View the Source
2. Germany: The Original Mixed Member Proportional System (ACE Project)
ACE Electoral Knowledge Network
  • Germany: The Original Mixed Member Proportional System page, second paragraph
    Its essence is the way in which it combines a personal vote in single-member districts with the principle of proportional representation.
  • Associated With: Germany
View the Source
Systems of Proportionality (Britannica)
Encyclopaedia BritannicaPart Of: Proportional RepresentationView the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.